So last week we had to think about and discuss the differences between using a blog and a message board, as well as consider the pros and cons of blogs. This week it's wikis.
I must confess...I am wiki-ignorant. Of course I know what they are; after all, my job requires many hours logged on a computer, but I have never really used one and I definitely have not created one. To be honest, I've never been a fan.
I know that the research literature claims they "help groups collaborate, share, and build online content...[especially for] distance learners who are separated by time and place" (West & West, 2009, p. 3) and I do not dispute this fact. As a matter of fact I find this to be a major pro. I think that the ability to allow students to actively engage with content and one another is a boon to their educational experience, especially online.
But I cannot help but be cautious.....
I never let my students cite wikis for classes. Let's be realistic; inaccuracies exist in these things...prolifically. Sources, such as the minimal sample below:
http://www.prsa.org/Intelligence/PRJournal/Documents/2012DiStaso.pdf
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/9211336/Six-out-of-10-Wikipedia-business-entries-contain-factual-errors.html
http://libguides.indstate.edu/wikipedia
(all of which are internet related) discuss the factual mishaps that occur in wikipedia. Sometimes misinformation is published and sometimes the information ends up being out-dated (this is generally not true for wikipedia since they have full-time staff now to help ensure entries are up-to-date). Unfortunately, other wikis who lack wikipedia's manpower are at risk of becoming outdated and error ridden. Ropog (2007) remarked about the Adult Literacy Education Wiki that if the site is to "grow and remain current...it must be updated and checked regularly for content and discussion additions" (p. 170) otherwise it would become outdated and full of errors if its users did not maintain it and keep up with the entries. This seems like a lot of work for something that can change from minute to minute, hour to hour, day to day.
While I see the value of a tool to which everyone is able to contribute, I also see the risks. I see it as something students could use to engage with as a means of building a project and using as a thinking tool to flesh out ideas, but I don't see it as more than that.
But I am always open to experimentation, especially in the classroom. The student cohort we are currently experiencing in adult education at the undergraduate level is getting younger (at least younger than me) and most of them are more technologically literate than I am, so I will not toss out the idea of using a wiki; I just want to make sure my students are aware of the great responsibility that comes with creating something that will live on long after the 16-week semester has passed.
I want to consider the questions of my own culpability.
-- What is my continued responsibility as a teacher to ensure course-created wikis stay factual and current once the semester is complete?
--How do I go about such a seemingly daunting task?
--How might I justify unpublishing work that my students worked on (I assume with a great amount of dedication) without it being a discredit to them and their time investment?
References
Ropog, M. M. (2007). Collaborating with Colleagues in Cyberspace. Adult Basic Education and Literacy Journal, 1(3), 169-171.
West, J. A., & West, M. L. (2009). Using wikis for online collaboration: The power of the read-write Web. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.